Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA

If Venus Ever Had a Moon, Tides Alone Would Have Destroyed It

Space

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A computer-generated perspective view of a volcano rising above the plains of Venus, built from Magellan radar data.
A volcano on Venus in a perspective view built from Magellan radar data, with the vertical scale exaggerated (illustrative)."NASA’s Magellan Data Reveals Volcanic Activity on Venus" by NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, via nasa, BY-NC · BY-NC

Venus has no moon, and a new modeling study finds that no violent event is needed to explain why: tides alone could have destroyed a satellite, if Venus ever had one. The survey is by Stephen R. Kane of the University of California and colleagues, in The Astrophysical Journal.

Two polar maps of Venus, northern and southern hemispheres, colored by planetary radius, with a color scale bar below.
Polar maps of the northern and southern hemispheres of Venus, colored by planetary radius (illustrative). — "Venus Without Place-Names" by sjrankin, via flickr, BY-NC

The moon in the study is hypothetical: the question is whether one that formed around Venus could have survived, not whether one existed. Their paper concludes that the absence of a Venusian moon can arise through tidal evolution alone, and that a later catastrophic event, while able to strip a moon away, is not required.

Kane and his co-authors modeled the tides raised on Venus by a moon and by the Sun, linking the planet's spin to the satellite's orbit, across a range of starting spin rates and moon masses. They ran the survey twice, under the two standard treatments of tidal friction, constant-Q and constant time lag.

Under the constant-Q treatment, a starting Venus day of about 15 hours or more, or a moon heavier than about twice the Moon's mass, doomed the satellite. As the planet's spin slows, the distance at which a moon would circle in step with it moves outward past the moon's orbit, and the moon spirals inward until Venus's gravity pulls it apart, within about 0.03 to 1.7 billion years.

On a circular orbit around a Venus turning once in roughly 12 hours or less, a moon of the Moon's mass survives the age of the solar system under both treatments. The other treatment, constant time lag, instead lets heavy moons survive at fast spin: the destruction result holds under one model, not both.

A radar view of the impact crater Adivar on Venus, ringed by bright ejecta streaks across a smooth plain.
The impact crater Adivar on Venus, seen in Magellan radar data (illustrative). — "Crater Adivar on Venus" by Lights In The Dark, via flickr, BY-NC-SA

Explaining Venus takes two things at once, the paper says: the moon has to disappear, and a fast-spinning planet has to end up rotating as slowly as Venus does. Both are met only inside a restricted part of the range surveyed. Simulations of giant impacts predict spin periods of about 12 hours or more for Venus's present rotation, which puts a Moon-mass satellite at the edge between survival and destruction.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

If Venus Ever Had a Moon, Tides Alone Would Have Destroyed It

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.