Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA

A New Model Ranks Nearby Planets by How Much Carbon Life Could Have Fixed

Space

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

An artist's concept of a cratered planet's curved limb in the foreground, with a small orange dwarf star and several other planets in a starry sky beyond.
The TRAPPIST-1 system seen from close to one of its seven planets, the dwarf star and several sibling worlds hanging in the sky (artist's concept)."Artist’s impression of the TRAPPIST-1 planetary system" by Hubble Space Telescope / ESA, via flickr, CC-BY-2.0 · CC-BY-2.0

Researchers at Northern Arizona University and the University of Bristol have proposed a way to estimate how far life could have evolved on a distant planet without observing any life there. Their measure is the total amount of carbon that photosynthesis could have turned into living matter on that planet over its lifetime. It is a model; nothing has been detected or measured at any planet outside the solar system.

The paper appeared Sept. 22 in the International Journal of Astrobiology. In it, Christopher Doughty and Michael Gowanlock of Northern Arizona University and their colleagues acknowledge that the hypothesis underneath the method is untestable. Earth is the only planet known to carry life, so the idea that biological evolution tracks the carbon a biosphere has fixed can be neither proved nor disproved. The authors say they are exploring what it would imply rather than establishing it, and that such an estimate would help decide where telescopes should look.

On the authors' accounting, Earth has fixed about 9.4 × 10²⁵ grams of carbon over its history. Modeled as an ocean world, TRAPPIST-1e, a planet roughly 40 light-years away that orbits a red dwarf at a distance where water could stay liquid, would need 18 billion years to reach the same total. Its mean estimated age is 7.6 billion years, which places it at a possible microbial rather than multicellular stage. The climate figures came from simulations an earlier model-comparison project had published, not from observations.

An artist's concept of the planet TRAPPIST-1 e as a dark disk beside its red dwarf star, with two smaller worlds farther out.
TRAPPIST-1 e, the world this model places at a microbial rather than a multicellular stage (artist's concept). — "NASA’s Webb Looks at Earth-sized, Habitable-zone Exoplanet TRAPPIST-1 e - 54774029725" by James Webb Space Telescope, via wikimedia, CC-BY-4.0

Applied to 29 nearby planets judged to have conditions that might suit life, the method puts two above Earth's running total and six at a possible multicellular stage. GJ 1061c and K2-3d come out highest under several of the scenarios, because they are larger, hotter, brighter and older than the rest. The paper names predicted rainfall as the largest uncertainty in the analysis. The authors recommend aiming observing time at those two planets.

The paper is open access, and the data and code behind its figures are posted on the Dryad repository.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

A New Model Ranks Nearby Planets by How Much Carbon Life Could Have Fixed

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.