Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedScience Advances1 source

Physicists Watch Electrons Cross a Superconducting Junction Without Bouncing Back

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A six-panel scientific figure. At upper left, a false-color electron micrograph shows a topological insulator flake contacted by aluminum and gold electrodes beside a 1 micrometer scale bar. The other panels plot bound-state energies against superconducting phase and color maps of differential conductance against magnetic field and bias voltage.
Panel A is the device itself, a flake of topological insulator (pink) bridged by aluminum leads (lavender) with two gold tunnel probes. In panel E the dark band is the energy gap the probes read out, and it closes each time the superconducting phase across the junction passes half a cycle.Fig. 1 from Jakob Schluck, Ella Nikodem, Anton Montag, Alexander Ziesen, Mahasweta Bagchi, Fabian Hassler, Yoichi Ando (2026), "Tunneling spectroscopy of topological insulator Josephson junctions", Science Advances — CC BY, resized

Physicists at the University of Cologne report they have measured electron states that cross a junction between two superconductors with almost no reflection, in a device built on a topological insulator, a crystal that carries current only along its outer surface. Such states, called Andreev modes, were predicted for this kind of junction in 2008. The paper says they had not been confirmed in a topological insulator before.

The measurement appears in a paper published Oct. 30, 2026, in Science Advances. Their interest is in what the proposal by Fu and Kane says should follow from such states: a route to Majorana zero modes, which the paper calls a promising candidate for topological quantum computing. The experiment is a transport measurement, not a qubit.

Jakob Schluck, Ella Nikodem and colleagues, with senior author Yoichi Ando at Cologne and theory from RWTH Aachen University, built the device from a thin aluminum film laid across an exfoliated flake of the insulating crystal BiSbTeSe2, leaving a junction about 50 nm long. An aluminum loop lets a magnetic field set the phase difference across that junction, and two gold contacts read the states underneath at about 50 mK. The energy gap they measure closes into a single broad peak at the phase difference the theory points to. The pattern repeats as the field is raised, and it held across the full range of back-gate voltages. The authors read that stability as support for a surface origin.

What the measurement cannot do is tell a perfect channel from a very good one. They put their energy resolution at about 30 μeV, enough to make any channel transmitting 95% or more of what hits it look gapless, and they call the topological reading "plausible but not inevitable," setting out ordinary explanations that would produce similar spectra. The paper states that the spin arrangement of that surface state "would make this a topological phase transition accompanied by a parity change, which remains to be confirmed by future experiments."

The authors also estimate what a device would need to hold a protected Majorana mode: niobium electrodes, which tolerate higher magnetic fields than aluminum, a field near 100 mT, and the surface electrons held at a moderate energy, which they say keeps the mode from spreading out. Their data and code are posted on Zenodo.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

Physicists Watch Electrons Cross a Superconducting Junction Without Bouncing Back

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.