Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: PreprintarXiv1 source

A Star's Spin Dates It Better Than Its Motion Through the Galaxy

Space

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A map of the star HD 12545 showing a giant dark starspot across one hemisphere, the Sun drawn to the same scale at upper left, and a temperature scale from 3500 to 4800 kelvin at right.
A giant starspot mapped across one hemisphere of the star HD 12545, with the Sun shown at the same scale (illustrative). Spots carried around by a star's rotation are what a measured rotation period is read from."Giant starspot (noao-12545)" by K.Strassmeier, Vienna, NOIRLab/NSF/AURA, via wikimedia, CC-BY-4.0 · CC-BY-4.0

Two astronomers at the University of Cambridge have put ages on six nearby red dwarf stars that host planets, and they report that a star's rotation dates it far more tightly than its motion through the Galaxy does.

Lalitha Sairam and Nikku Madhusudhan, both at Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy, write that reliable ages are needed to work out how planetary systems around these small, cool stars form and change. Among those systems are the temperate sub-Neptunes now being observed with the James Webb Space Telescope, planets that fall between Earth and Neptune in size. Red dwarfs are hard to date because they evolve so slowly that matching them against models of stellar aging gives little constraint.

The analysis applies three age indicators to the same six stars, among them K2-18 and TOI-270, both already observed with JWST. It was posted to arXiv on Sept. 15, 2026, and has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Lithium absorption was absent in all six, and because lithium fades from these stars early in life, the authors write, its absence puts their ages above 200 million years. Rotation periods of 39 to 145 days yield ages of 2.8 billion to 8.6 billion years. Ages worked out from the stars' motion through the Galaxy carry uncertainties of 4 billion to 6 billion years.

A spectrum plot with wavelength in angstroms on the horizontal axis, showing a deep lithium absorption line at 6708 angstroms in one star and almost none in the other.
The lithium line at 6708 angstroms, deep in one star and nearly absent in another (illustrative). Lithium fades early in a star's life, so its absence sets a lower limit on age. — "Lithium in giant Star 850 in stellar cluster Be21 (eso9905b)" by ESO, via wikimedia, CC-BY-4.0

Where a rotation period has actually been measured, Sairam and Madhusudhan put the rotation-based constraint at 2 to 6 times tighter than the one from Galactic motion. Where the period has to be inferred from activity in the star's outer atmosphere, they report that the two approaches do about equally well.

The motion-based ages are less precise star by star, the authors write, but they flag outliers such as TOI-1231 and place the sample in Galactic context. Sairam and Madhusudhan had already dated two of the six, K2-18 and TOI-732, from rotation in earlier work; here all six are analyzed together with the same set of indicators.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

A Star's Spin Dates It Better Than Its Motion Through the Galaxy

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.