Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedNature Astronomy3 sources

A Dead Star's Odd Chemistry Points to a Planet Born After It Died

Space

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

Artist's impression of a white dwarf at the center of a glowing disk of gas, with a giant planet at right shedding a stream of gas into the disk.
Gas escaping a giant planet spirals into a disk around the dead star it orbits, in another system where astronomers have watched the process (illustrative)."Artist’s impression of the WDJ0914+1914 system" by ESO/M. Kornmesser, via wikimedia, CC-BY-4.0

A reanalysis of ultraviolet spectra the Hubble Space Telescope took in 1999 has found the white dwarf HS 0209+0832, the burnt-out core of a dead star, pulling in material that matches nothing in the Solar System. Jamie T. Williams and Boris T. Gänsicke of the University of Warwick and colleagues report an atmosphere heavy in zinc, copper and niobium, with almost none of the silicon and iron that build rocky planets. Their paper was published Oct. 5, 2026, in Nature Astronomy.

The team reads that chemistry as gas escaping from a giant planet that formed after the star died, out of material the star shed as it was dying. The paper calls the object a second-generation planet candidate and says no equivalent has previously been identified orbiting a white dwarf. The authors write that the same signature, carbon plus those heavy elements, gives astronomers a way to look for others.

The earlier spectrum had left about 100 absorption lines unidentified. Matching them against newly computed model spectra, the team assigned most to copper and niobium, and found niobium in none of 33 other metal-enriched white dwarfs it checked. The material falling onto the star is rich in nickel: the authors measure a nickel-to-iron ratio above 2.09, against about 0.05 in primitive meteorites and in Earth as a whole. No white dwarf known to be swallowing rock, and no Solar System meteorite, matches it.

A chart of measured element abundances in the material falling onto HS 0209+0832, plotted against bulk Earth, with the Sun, comet Halley and several other polluted white dwarfs for comparison.
The measured abundances (red stars) run high in zinc, copper and niobium and low in silicon and iron, matching neither bulk Earth nor any of the comparison objects plotted here. Fig. 2 from Jamie T. Williams, Boris T. Gänsicke, Nicholas C. Stone, Detlev Koester, Benjamin D. R. Davies, Christopher Tong, David J. Wilson, Snehalata Sahu, Andrew Swan, Thomas G. Beatty, Sergio H. Ramírez, Tim Cunningham, Knox S. Long (2026), "Discovery of a second-generation planet candidate accreting onto a white dwarf", Nature Astronomy — CC BY 4.0

Brightness measurements from NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, across four observing sectors, carry a repeating cycle of 4.399 days. The team attributes it either to a tidally locked giant planet turning its day and night sides into view, or to a tail of gas streaming off an evaporating one. No planet has been seen directly or caught crossing the star, so the case rests on the chemistry and that cycle.

The authors add that a lone dying star is unlikely to leave a disk behind, and that this one probably had a companion close enough to be pulled into its swelling outer layers and throw them off as a disk a planet could collapse from.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

A Dead Star's Odd Chemistry Points to a Planet Born After It Died

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.