Skip to content
See the World Through Science
Source: Peer-reviewed1 source

DNA Switches Designed by AI Worked in Mouse Embryos, All 15 Times

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

Three rows of five stained mouse embryos, each row labelled Enhancer 1 to 5, with blue staining marking the heart, the limb and the central nervous system, next to sequence contribution plots.
The right-hand panels of the study's Figure 2: LacZ-stained transgenic mouse embryos at embryonic day 11.5, five per tissue, with blue marking where each designed enhancer switched on the reporter gene in heart, limb and central nervous system.Fig. 2 from Shenzhi Chen, Vincent Loubiere, Ethan W. Hollingsworth, Ken Murakami, Nikolaus Mandlburger, Sandra H. Jacinto, Atrin Dizehchi, Jacob Schreiber, Evgeny Z. Kvon, Alexander Stark (2026), "Predictive design of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers that function in the mouse embryo", Nature Genetics — CC BY 4.0, cropped · CC-BY-4.0

All 15 DNA sequences that researchers designed with neural networks switched a gene on in the tissue they were meant for when tested in mouse embryos, according to a paper published Aug. 25 in Nature Genetics.

The sequences are enhancers, short stretches of DNA that turn nearby genes on in particular tissues. The team trained small neural networks on data showing which parts of the genome are physically open in the heart, limb and midbrain of mouse embryos, then retrained them on enhancers already confirmed in humans and mice. Between 311 and 432 confirmed enhancers per tissue were available for that step. A sequence-design program called Ledidi then wrote candidate enhancers 1,001 base pairs long.

Five candidates each for heart, limb and central nervous system were put into mouse embryos on a reporter that stains active tissue. All 15 were reproducibly active in their target tissue, meaning at least three embryos showed a signal, the threshold the paper says it adopted from the VISTA enhancer database. Specificity varied: four of five heart designs and four of five nervous-system designs acted only in the intended tissue, while all five limb designs also showed weaker activity in other connective tissue.

On sequences held out of training, the models' positive predictive value reached 70.6% or higher, the authors report; models trained only on the openness data, or only on the confirmed enhancers, scored 20.9% to 52.1%. None of the 15 designed sequences resembled anything in the mouse or human genome.

Targeting a smaller brain region worked less well. Of two sequences designed for the midbrain, one was inactive and the other gave an uninterpretable result because of a duplication in the reporter, the paper says.

The authors write that the work "establishes a generalizable framework for programmable control of mammalian gene expression in vivo, opening new avenues in functional genomics, synthetic biology and gene therapy."

The Letter is open access. Its senior authors are Evgeny Z. Kvon at the University of California, Irvine, and Alexander Stark at the Research Institute of Molecular Pathology in Vienna.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

DNA Switches Designed by AI Worked in Mouse Embryos, All 15 Times

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.