Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA

Birds Born Elsewhere Explain When a Wild Population Evolves and When It Stalls

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A great tit perched on a bare branch against a blue sky, showing its black head stripe and yellow breast.
A great tit perched in a tree in spring. A Dutch study followed clutch size in two great tit populations on the island of Vlieland (illustrative)."Great tit, nesting in our garden (Parus major)" by adinsen, via Flickr, BY-NC · BY-NC

Great tits arriving from outside a population, rather than natural selection acting on the birds already there, explain when that population's genetics shifted and when it held still. Simon Evans and Erik Postma of the University of Exeter, with colleagues at the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, report the result from 44 years of nest records on a Dutch island.

Evolutionary stasis is the long-standing puzzle of a trait that stays put for decades even though selection should be pushing it one way. The authors argue that forecasts of how wild populations will evolve as their surroundings change have to include gene flow, the genes carried in by outsiders that settle and breed. A population can look unchanged from the outside while evolving underneath, because what the newcomers bring in cancels what selection does locally.

The study appeared on September 21 in PLOS Biology. It follows clutch size, the number of eggs a female lays in one nest, in two neighboring great tit populations at opposite ends of the Dutch island of Vlieland. Between 1996 and 2003 an artificial selection experiment deliberately reversed the genetic difference in clutch size between them.

An opened wooden nest box showing a nest of moss and animal hair holding three speckled great tit eggs.
A great tit nest with eggs inside an opened nest box. Counting the eggs in boxes like this is how clutch size is recorded season after season (illustrative). "Parus major Great tit eggs in nesting box" by user: Neozoon, via Wikimedia, CC-BY-SA-3.0

The authors report that year-to-year genetic change did move in the direction selection predicted, which rules out complete stasis, but was smaller than adaptive models forecast. On average, 3% of the selection measured in the population turned into genetic change, against the 11% expected from how strongly clutch size is inherited. Leaving newly arrived immigrants out of that calculation, and counting only birds hatched on the study site, made selection a better predictor.

Splitting each year's change between breeder deaths, local recruits and immigrant recruits, the authors found immigration often outweighed the change generated within the population itself. In the eastern population before the experiment, clutch size looked genetically static while local evolution toward smaller clutches was being offset by incoming birds pushing the other way.

The data, code and models behind the analysis are archived and openly available on Zenodo.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

Birds Born Elsewhere Explain When a Wild Population Evolves and When It Stalls

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.