Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedPLOS Biology1 source

Bats Got as Sick as Rodents in 86 Years of Lab Infections

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

An Egyptian fruit bat hanging upside down from a branch at night, surrounded by clusters of small pale fruit.
An Egyptian fruit bat feeds in a fruiting tree in Turkey, photographed April 10, 2022. Bats have long been assumed to carry viruses without falling ill themselves (illustrative)."Rousettus aegyptiacus in Turkey 187450372" by Vsevolod Rudyi, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

Bats infected with viruses in the laboratory got sick as often and as severely as rodents did, a team at the University of Glasgow reports after pooling 86 years of published infection experiments.

The belief that bats carry dangerous viruses without falling ill has driven a search for unusual defenses in their immune systems, in the hope of finding a drug that works against many viruses at once. Writing in PLOS Biology on Oct. 29, 2026, Maxwell J. Farrell, Daniel G. Streicker and two colleagues say that premise had never been formally tested.

Dozens of Egyptian fruit bats hanging close together from a pale cave wall.
A roosting colony in Israel, photographed Nov. 3, 2019. The 86 years of work pooled by the team were laboratory infections rather than observations of wild colonies (illustrative). "Rousettus aegyptiacus in Israel 55707974" by Natasha Haggard, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

The dataset they assembled covers 54 viruses and more than 5,600 inoculated animals. Illness was not confined to a few odd pairings. Severe disease or death appears in bats given rabies-family viruses, tick-borne encephalitis virus, dengue virus and West Nile virus, among others.

Disease showed up in 73% of the bat and virus pairs in the collection and 48% of the rodent ones. Bat experiments tended to use more animals each, which can make illness easier to notice. The team therefore ran statistical models adjusting for the number of animals, the dose, the way the virus was given and the hosts' shared ancestry. In those models, host group made no difference to any of the three measures: whether disease appeared, how bad it got, and whether the animal died.

What shaped the outcome instead was the design of the experiment, the number of host species a virus can infect, and the evolutionary relationship between virus and host. The pattern held when the comparison was narrowed to viruses that circulate naturally in bats given to bats, and rodent viruses given to rodents.

The team calls the synthesis the first quantitative test of the idea. It does not rule out drugs derived from bat immunity, the authors write, but they read bat immune systems as shaped by ordinary co-evolution rather than by anything unique to bats. The data and analysis scripts are public, posted on GitHub and archived at Zenodo. The journal has posted the paper as an uncorrected proof.

Sources

By Olga SchmidtEditor-in-Chief, Writer

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

Bats Got as Sick as Rodents in 86 Years of Lab Infections

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.