Skip to content
See the World Through Science
Source: Peer-reviewed1 source

A Genetic Method Weighs Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Depression at Once

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

Two charts: overlapping bell curves of a standardised polygenic risk score for cases and controls, and a chart of risk rising with age for high, average and low scores
Case-control polygenic risk scores overlap heavily between groups; DDx-PRS combines several such scores with prior clinical probabilities. Illustrative diagram from Wand et al., via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0 - not a figure from the study."PRS Illustration" by Hannah Wand et al. (33 authors; full list at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=94392607), via wikimedia, CC-BY-4.0 · CC-BY-4.0

A method published Aug. 20 in Nature Genetics returns a probability for each of four categories at once: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, or none of the three. Genetic risk scores are normally computed one disorder at a time against controls. The authors call the method DDx-PRS, short for differential diagnosis-polygenic risk score, and the worked illustration in the study runs schizophrenia 50%, bipolar disorder 25%, major depression 15%, control 10%.

It combines case-control polygenic risk scores, which sum up many small genetic effects into one number per disorder, with prior clinical probabilities, and models how the underlying liabilities to the three disorders overlap, according to the study. The authors, with first author Wouter J. Peyrot and the schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder working groups of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, trained it on summary results from three case-control genome-wide association studies, covering 41,917 to 173,140 cases each and 1,048,683 people in total.

They then tested it on held-out consortium cohorts totaling 11,460 people, assembled with equal numbers in each of the four categories, which is not the mix that walks into a clinic. On that data the method was "well calibrated and well powered," consistent with the group's own simulations, and gave results comparable to methods that need separate tuning data, the authors report.

In the top deciles of predicted probability, meaning the highest-scoring slices of the test sample rather than a typical person in it, the true diagnosis probabilities were "considerably larger" than the baseline probabilities the model was given to start from, the paper reports. From that the authors write that the results imply "appreciable potential for clinical utility in certain settings." That is their assessment of their own method, which has not been used in a clinic, tested in a trial or submitted to a regulator.

The paper is classified as a Technical Report. The software is posted on GitHub and archived on Zenodo, and the case-control study results behind it can be downloaded from the consortium.

Sources

By Olga SchmidtChief Editor, Writer

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

A Genetic Method Weighs Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Depression at Once

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.