Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedMicroplastics and Nanoplastics1 source

No Study Has Measured Plastic Intake and Excretion in the Same People

Environment

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A researcher in a white protective coat and face mask looks into an infrared microscope at a laboratory bench, with a spectrum on the computer screen beside it.
A researcher examines a sample under an infrared microscope at the French marine institute Ifremer in May 2020 (illustrative). Instruments like this one identify the plastic particles in a sample; what no study has yet done is track those particles through the same person."Analyse d'échantillons (Ifremer 00702-81374 - 33892)" by Stephane Lesbats, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

A review published Nov. 3, 2026, in the journal Microplastics and Nanoplastics argues that no human study has measured microplastic intake and excretion in the same people, so the models that convert an intake estimate into a dose inside the body cannot be fitted to the data.

Risk assessment for microplastics rests on that translation from a swallowed amount to a tissue dose, and the review calls it an assumption the field has left implicit. Timothy Yu Yee Ong, Lai Ti Gew and colleagues at the Jeffrey Cheah Sunway Medical School at Sunway University in Malaysia scoped 22 eligible studies. Those studies measured plastics in people, in lab-grown tissue, in animals and in cells, and none of them follows intake and elimination in the same individuals.

The authors call the resulting models non-identifiable: several different combinations of intake, retention and clearance fit the same measurements equally well, so the data cannot say which one is right. Plastic found in a tissue sample also mixes particles that arrived by swallowing, by breathing and through the skin, with nothing to assign them to a route. The review offers no independent estimate of how much plastic a person carries, and does not read the gap as evidence either way about harm.

A diagram showing estimated plastic intake reaching a human figure by inhalation, ingestion and skin contact on the left and a single internal body burden on the right, marked as non-identifiable.
A one-figure statement of the argument: several exposure routes feed one internal number, and many different parameter sets reproduce that number equally well. The band of correlations in the middle, 0.88–0.98, is what the fixed-fraction model generates on its own. Figure from Timothy Yu Yee Ong, Long Chiau Ming, Raja Affendi Raja Ali, Lai Ti Gew (2026), "When exposure isn’t dose: parameter non-identifiability as the central barrier to human microplastic toxicokinetics", Microplastics and Nanoplastics — CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, resized

Many published models assume that a fixed share of what is swallowed is excreted. The group tested that assumption by running repeated randomized simulations on a synthetic data set built from published values. The researchers report that intake and excretion came out almost perfectly matched, at a correlation of 0.949 in their demonstration and between 0.88 and 0.98 across the conditions tested. They add that the tightness follows from how the model is written rather than from any coupling inside the body. The quantitative work covers particles 1 micrometer and larger, with smaller nanoplastics treated qualitatively.

The review sets out what a usable model would have to measure: the same people followed over time, with intake, elimination and retention recorded route by route. Those conditions are translated into design and reporting rules for future studies.

Sources

By Oli KotykManaging Editor, Writer

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

No Study Has Measured Plastic Intake and Excretion in the Same People

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.