Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedScientific Reports1 source

Arctic Sea Ice Can Be Forecast From Its Own Past, With No Physics at All

Environment

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A visualization of the Arctic Ocean seen from above the pole, with white sea ice covering the central Arctic and open water around its edges.
Satellite data from September 9, 2011 maps the ice cap near its yearly low, with the Northwest Passage largely open (illustrative)."Arctic Sea Ice Minimum" by NASA Goddard Photo and Video, via nasa, CC-BY-2.0

Two researchers have built a predictor of how much of the Arctic Ocean will be covered by ice a season ahead, using nothing but the historical record of the ice itself. There is no physics in it and no climate model. Writing in Scientific Reports on Oct. 5, Faiq Raees of New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Francesco Paparella of New York University Abu Dhabi report that when the method is run over past years, it predicts the September average with skill they describe as comparable to that of the models of the Sea Ice Prediction Network.

The pair propose it not as a forecast to use but as a floor to clear: a baseline that any physics-based or AI-based sea ice model should have to beat, and they argue that failing to outperform it is a serious shortcoming for a model meant to describe sea ice realistically.

The technique is an old one. Their random analog predictor is a randomized version of the analog method: it searches the past record for stretches that resemble the present one and treats what followed each of them as one possible forecast, producing a spread rather than a single number. A statistic called band depth then picks the most representative forecast in that spread. Compared with what was actually observed, the authors report negligible bias and a root-mean-square error no larger than 0.6 million square kilometers.

On their account, what makes it suitable as a benchmark is what it lacks. It is simple, it can be inspected, it assumes nothing about the physics of ice, and it attaches an uncertainty estimate to its own forecasts.

The paper is open access, and Tamkeen funded both authors through New York University Abu Dhabi research institute awards.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

Arctic Sea Ice Can Be Forecast From Its Own Past, With No Physics at All

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.