Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedNature1 source

New Gene-Editing Method Adds Whole Genes Without Cutting Both Strands

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A colorized scanning electron micrograph of a single human T lymphocyte, its surface covered in fine ruffled folds, shown in orange against a black background.
A colorized scanning electron micrograph of a human T cell. The new method was tested in primary human T cells taken from healthy donors (illustrative)."T Lymphocyte" by NIAID, via wikimedia, CC-BY-2.0 · CC-BY-2.0

Researchers at Boston Children's Hospital have reported a way to insert whole genes at a chosen point in the human genome without cutting both strands of the double helix and without waiting for the cell to divide. Sébastien Levesque, Daniel Bauer and colleagues published the method, which they call prime assembly, on Sept. 16 in Nature.

What it is meant to get around is a size limit. Prime assembly is built on prime editing, which rewrites short DNA sequences in place and currently supports changes of less than 250 base pairs, the paper states. The methods that install longer sequences generally depend either on breaking both DNA strands or on repair machinery that works only in dividing cells.

A multi-panel scientific figure. Panel a diagrams prime assembly, showing two DNA flaps written at a target site, a donor DNA strand annealing to them, and the replaced sequence. The remaining panels are bar charts of editing outcomes in K562 cells.
Panel a diagrams the method: paired prime editing writes a forward and a reverse flap at the target site, donor DNA anneals to both flaps, and the original stretch is excised and replaced by fill-in synthesis and nick ligation. The lower panels quantify the edited alleles in a human cell line. — Fig. 1 from Sébastien Levesque, Nozomu Kawashima, Gue-Ho Hwang, Jing Zeng, Vasil Toskov, Timothy Barry, William Mannherz, Luke Homfeldt, Basheer Becerra, Vivien A. C. Schoonenberg, Luca Pinello, Suneet Agarwal, Daniel E. Bauer (2026), "Targeted genomic integration and rearrangement using prime assembly", Nature — CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, resized

The group used prime assembly to rewrite a short stretch of one gene, to place gene-sized inserts as large as 12.1 kilobases, and to cut about a million bases out of one chromosome while inserting a marker used to select the edited cells. Efficiency fell as the inserts grew larger. All 48 single-cell clones tested after that deletion carried the intended change when the donor DNA was supplied as single strands.

In cells taken from healthy donors, the figures are much smaller. The authors reported editing an average of 3.3% of target sites in resting T cells and about 1.5% in blood stem cells. All of the work is in cultured cells, and the paper reports no animal or patient data.

The authors describe the large deletions as the first they know of to be made in human cells with a prime editor and no enzyme cutting both strands. They write that donors of this kind could provide universal strategies against many mutations that cause disease. That is a statement about what the approach might permit, not a result. The paper's own reference list carries three other 2026 reports of large insertions made with prime editing.

Sources

By Olga SchmidtChief Editor, Writer

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

New Gene-Editing Method Adds Whole Genes Without Cutting Both Strands

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.