Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedScientific Reports1 source

Tiny Shore Crustaceans of the Same Size Carried Very Different Amounts of Plastic

Environment

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A pale sandhopper about a centimeter long standing on wet beach sand beside a green strand of seaweed.
A sandhopper, Talitrus saltator, on wet sand beside a strand of seaweed. The six species in the study are peracarid crustaceans of this kind, living in seaweed, wet sand and rock cracks at the water's edge (illustrative)."Talitrus saltator 3" by Arnold Paul, via wikimedia, CC-BY-SA-2.5 · CC-BY-SA-2.5

Six small shoreline crustaceans of about the same size and diet, collected along the same stretch of central Mediterranean coast, carried very different amounts of plastic, and the spread tracked differences in their mouthparts. Microplastic was present in 51.5% of individuals of one species, Parhyale plumicornis, and in 3.5% of another, Gammarus subtypicus, in a study published Sept. 25 in Scientific Reports.

The paper says the aim was to look for a relationship between the shape of these animals' mouthparts and how much plastic they take in along the coast. The six are peracarids, the small shrimp-like crustaceans that live in seaweed, wet sand and rock cracks at the water's edge.

The authors, led by Aldona Dobrzycka-Krahel of WSB Merito University in Gdansk and Sabrina Lo Brutto of the University of Palermo, examined the digestive canal of each species. Speziorchestia stephenseni, a beach hopper, was second at 40% of individuals, and Gammarus insensibilis was at 8.3%. The set also included Orchestia montagui and Ligia italica, a relative of the woodlouse. Every species averaged 12 mm in total length, and all fed on algae and decaying material. The figures are shares of individuals with at least one particle in the gut, not counts of particles per animal.

A labeled line diagram of an amphipod seen from the side, naming the head, the antennae, the body segments and the limbs.
A labeled diagram of amphipod anatomy, naming the head, the antennae and the limbs. Five of the six species in the study are amphipods built on this plan, and the sixth, Ligia italica, is an isopod (illustrative). — "Scheme amphipod anatomy-en" by Hans Hillewaert, via wikimedia, CC-BY-SA-4.0

The two species with the most plastic share two traits of the mouthparts. Both lack the small feeler, called a palp, that sits on the jaw, and on the feeding limb just behind the jaw, a second such feeler is shortened or carries fewer joints. They write that the results may suggest these two species store increased levels of microplastic in coastal waters, because those traits leave them open to swallowing particles. The study shows an association between feeding anatomy and what was inside the animals, not a mechanism.

The paper is open access, and Scientific Reports has posted the accepted version ahead of the final edited one. The work was funded by the University of Palermo, the Gdańsk University of Technology and Italy's National Biodiversity Future Center.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

Tiny Shore Crustaceans of the Same Size Carried Very Different Amounts of Plastic

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.