Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewedNature Communications1 source

A Glacier Model Run Day by Day Instead of Month by Month Projects More Ice Loss

Environment

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

A person in a red jacket stands on the crevassed white surface of Grey Glacier, with dark granite peaks above and a meltwater lake beyond the ice front.
A walker crosses the crevassed ice above the meltwater lake at the ice front. The study's global model simulates every glacier larger than 5 square kilometers, Patagonia's among them (illustrative)."View of Grey Glacier in Torres del Paine National Park, Chilean Patagonia" by Duiliofg, via wikimedia, CC-BY-4.0

A daily-resolution version of a global glacier model projects 5–10% more ice loss by 2100 than the monthly version it was built from, an extra 20–33 mm of global mean sea-level rise. Lander Van Tricht, Daniel Farinotti and colleagues at ETH Zurich and the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL) ran both settings of the Global Glacier Evolution Model for every glacier larger than 5 square kilometers, and published the comparison Oct. 19, 2026.

Such models normally run on monthly average temperature and precipitation. The team reports in Nature Communications that monthly averaging hides heat waves, the switch between rain and snow near freezing, and fast changes in a glacier's surface between snow and bare ice. Leaving that variability out may systematically underestimate future glacier loss, and the time step matters most where glacier projections feed water-supply and hydropower assessments.

Measured against 2025, the daily model projects global glacier losses of 26% by the end of the century under a low-emission scenario and 47% under a high-emission one, both with a wide spread across the climate models. That extra loss is a difference between two model setups, not an observed one.

A multi-panel chart of modeled global glacier ice volume to 2100 under three emission scenarios, the resulting contribution to sea-level rise, and the difference between the daily and monthly model runs.
Projected global ice volume through 2100 under three emission scenarios, with the resulting sea-level contribution and the gap between the daily and monthly runs. Fig. 4 from Lander Van Tricht, Matthias Huss, Harry Zekollari, Rodrigo Aguayo, Janosch Beer, Marit van Tiel, Alexandra von der Esch, Daniel Farinotti (2026), "Resolving short-term meteorological variability amplifies projected glacier loss and sea-level rise", Nature Communications — CC BY 4.0, resized

The gap is widest in flat, ice-cap regions. For Svalbard, the Russian Arctic, and the Antarctic and sub-Antarctic islands, the daily model projects up to 25% more loss over the century, which the authors call upper-end estimates because those regions are unusually sensitive to calibration. Iceland goes the other way, at 4% less loss, because resolving single days sorts more of its warm, wet storms as rain rather than snow.

Against 4,037 annual field measurements of glacier mass balance, the daily version matched observations slightly better, an improvement the authors call modest. The gain was larger in extreme melt years, which monthly averaging flattens. In Western Canada and the United States, the daily model also puts the yearly runoff peak about 46 days earlier by 2100 than in the 2001 to 2020 baseline.

Daily runs cost substantially more computing time, and the authors expect monthly models to stay standard.

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

A Glacier Model Run Day by Day Instead of Month by Month Projects More Ice Loss

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.