Skip to content
See the World Through Science
Source: Peer-reviewedNature Communications1 source

The Tasmanian Tiger's Skull Has No Match Among Living Predators

Science

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

Side view of a thylacine skull with its jaws wide open, showing a long slender snout, a flared canine region and rows of sharp teeth, mounted in a museum display.
A thylacine skull on museum display, jaws open. Measurements of crania like this one show a combination of traits shared by no living carnivore."Thylacine skull" by KeresH, via wikimedia, CC-BY-SA-3.0 · CC-BY-SA-3.0

The skull of the thylacine, the marsupial predator hunted to extinction in Tasmania in 1936, combines features found in no living meat-eating mammal, according to a study published Aug. 31 in Nature Communications. Its authors say that complicates the animal's standing as a textbook case of convergent evolution with wolves and foxes.

Vera Weisbecker of Flinders University and three colleagues compared three-dimensional shape measurements across 225 skulls spanning 14 families of meat-eating mammals, the paper reports. The thylacine's snout sits closest to foxes and jackals, they write, while its braincase sits closer to its marsupial relatives, a pairing that the paper says is "not represented among canids or other living mammalian carnivores."

The head is also outsized for the body. The thylacine weighed about 17 kilograms, the authors report, but its skull matches in size the skulls of species weighing 24.5 to 66.7 kilograms. The foxes and jackals nearest to it in overall skull shape weigh 6 to 14 kilograms.

From that mix, a long, narrow, unusually tall snout on a large skull with an expanded flare of bone at the canines that the authors call a terminal rosette, the team infers a fast, high-impact snapping bite used on relatively small, quick prey, which earlier work cited in the paper puts at about 45% of the thylacine's own body mass. The traits "suggest adaptations to fast, high-impact snapping behaviour in prey capture," the authors write, a reading of bone shape rather than an observation of a living animal.

The skulls also carry an unusually large infraorbital foramen, the facial opening a sensory nerve passes through. The paper reports it exceeds in both absolute and relative size any figure recorded for a living marsupial, and says no clear explanation can be offered for the trait.

The study is open access. Co-authors Andrew J. Pask and Axel H. Newton of the University of Melbourne write that the completed thylacine genome offers a route to test which developmental changes produced these skull features.

Sources

By Olga SchmidtChief Editor, Writer

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

The Tasmanian Tiger's Skull Has No Match Among Living Predators

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.