Skip to content
See the World Through ScienceA project of ALLATRA
Source: Peer-reviewed1 source

An AI Learned to Cut Air Drag in a Wind Tunnel Without Any Model of the Airflow

AI & Technology

Republish this story

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. You may republish this piece for free — with credit to ALLATRA Media and a link to the original, unedited beyond length trims, and not for commercial use.

Read the full license

Black-and-white schlieren photograph of a wind-tunnel test: a dark aircraft model silhouette with sharp shock waves fanning out from its nose and tail and a mottled turbulent wake trailing behind it.
Schlieren photography makes airflow visible in a wind tunnel: shock waves and a turbulent wake around a North American X-15 model. Illustrative — a different facility, model and flow regime from the Imperial College experiment described here."North American X-15 Supersonic wind tunnel testing showing the shock waves." by aeroman3, via flickr, CC0 · CC0

A learning algorithm has cut the aerodynamic drag on a car-shaped model inside a real wind tunnel, working only from sensor readings and with no model of the turbulent air around it. Junjie Zhang and Georgios Rigas of the Department of Aeronautics at Imperial College London, with colleagues there and at Peking University, published the result Sept. 7 in Communications Engineering.

That it ran in hardware is the point. Most machine-learning results in fluid control come out of computer simulations; this one learned in moving air, from measurements taken as it acted. Drag is fuel, and on a blunt shape most of it comes from the churning wake behind the body, the part of the physics engineers model worst.

The system, which the team calls REACT, ran on an Ahmed body, a simplified car shape used as a standard test object in aerodynamics labs. It carried only onboard sensors and small servo-driven surfaces. From sparse tunnel measurements, it converged on a policy that reduced drag and still returned a net energy saving once the power its surfaces drew was counted, the paper reports. Given no prior knowledge of the flow physics, the agent found for itself that damping the organized, repeating swirls in the wake is what saves the most energy.

Set against model-based controllers the team ran as baselines on the same rig, REACT reached what the paper describes as "two to four times greater performance." A single policy trained offline stayed effective without retraining across Reynolds numbers of 86,400 to 518,400. Reynolds number measures how turbulent a flow is, and that range spans a sixfold spread of conditions.

The authors describe the work as a demonstration of autonomous closed-loop reinforcement-learning control in a high-Reynolds-number wind-tunnel environment, and say it suggests "a path toward data-driven, state-dependent control of turbulent flows."

Sources

Spot an error?

Spot an error?

Report an error

Spotted a mistake on this page? Tell us what's wrong and our editors will take a look.

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We correct mistakes openly. Select any text to flag it. Fixes are logged under our Corrections Policy.

Report an error

Reporting on

An AI Learned to Cut Air Drag in a Wind Tunnel Without Any Model of the Airflow

What kind of problem?

Only if you'd like us to be able to follow up. We won't use it for anything else.

We read every report. Corrections are logged publicly.